Category Theory for Linear Logicians
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper presents an introduction to category theory with an emphasis on those aspects relevant to the analysis of the model theory of linear logic. With this in mind, we focus on the basic definitions of category theory and categorical logic. An analysis of cartesian and cartesian closed categories and their relation to intuitionistic logic is followed by a consideration of symmetric monoidal closed, linearly distributive and ∗-autonomous categories and their relation to multiplicative linear logic. We examine nonsymmetric monoidal categories, and consider them as models of noncommutative linear logic. We introduce traced monoidal categories, and discuss their relation to the geometry of interaction. The necessary aspects of the theory of monads is introduced in order to describe the categorical modelling of the exponentials. We conclude by briefly describing the notion of full completeness, a strong form of categorical completeness, which originated in the categorical model theory of linear logic. No knowledge of category theory is assumed, but we do assume knowledge of linear logic sequent calculus and the standard models of linear logic, and modest familiarity with typed lambda calculus.
منابع مشابه
Algebras Versus Coalgebras
Algebras and coalgebras are fundamental notions for large parts of mathematics. The basic constructions from universal algebra are now expressed in the language of categories and thus are accessible to classical algebraists and topologists as well as to logicians and computer scientists. Some of them have developed specialised parts of the theory and often reinvented constructions already known...
متن کاملAn introduction to quantaloid-enriched categories
This survey paper, specifically targeted at a readership of fuzzy logicians and fuzzy set theorists, aims to provide a gentle introduction to the basic notions of quantaloidenriched category theory. We discuss at length the definitions of quantaloid, quantaloidenriched category, distributor and functor, always giving several examples that – hopefully – appeal to the intended readership. To indi...
متن کاملFrom Sets, to Types, to Categories, to Sets
Three different styles of foundations of mathematics are now commonplace: set theory, type theory, and category theory. How do they relate, and how do they differ? What advantages and disadvantages does each one have over the others? We pursue these questions by considering interpretations of each system into the others and examining the preservation and loss of mathematical content thereby. In...
متن کاملMR1971367 (2004c:03007) 03A05 03B65
Although grammarians traditionally consider names and quantifier expressions (“something”, “everything”, etc.) as belonging to the noun phrases category, logicians usually treat quantifiers as operators, i.e., as expressions of a different category from the name category. In this brief and valuable paper, logical differences between names and quantifiers are studied on a deductive level while a...
متن کاملFibered Categories and the Foundations of Naive Category Theory
?0. Introduction. Any attempt to give "foundations", for category theory or any domain in mathematics, could have two objectives, of course related. (0.1) Noncontradiction: Namely, to provide a formal frame rich enough so that all the actual activity in the domain can be carried out within this frame, and consistent, or at least relatively consistent with a well-established and "safe" theory, e...
متن کامل